Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with an 82.7 score against 72.6. Both phones we are comparing here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should give you all the same operating system features. Although LG G8X ThinQ and realme X3 SuperZoom were released with only 7 months difference, LG G8X ThinQ is a bit lighter and just a little thinner.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ and realme X3 SuperZoom count with quite similar displays, because although the LG G8X ThinQ has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much greater storage to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures greater photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a little bit longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.