Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Titan gray |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 85.4 score against 72.6. These phones use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. The LG K92 design is a little bit heavier but a bit thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, and both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a bit better number of pixels in each display inch. The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM.
Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG K92, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a 64 megapixels resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and better video frame rate.
The LG K92 features much more memory for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a little better battery life than LG K92, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
The LG K92 costs a little more than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.