Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Blue and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a score of 87.6 against 72.6. The LG V60 ThinQ design has the same thickness than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is a little bit heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has a newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. Realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better processing power than LG V60 ThinQ. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The realme X3 SuperZoom takes greater videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ. They have the same video frame rate, a same size sensor, the same camera aperture, a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution and the same (4K) video definition. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features longer battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.