Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. The LG Velvet body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, although they were released only a couple months apart. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a slightly better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a much more MP back camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG Velvet counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a bit superior battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 2% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.