Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a score of 85.3 against 72.6. Even though Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is heavier than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's thinner and newer. These phones have Android OS, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a more recent 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a better resolution of 1892 x 2688px. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the realme X3 SuperZoom, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little better hardware performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit longer battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much more MP back facing camera.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a lot more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.