Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. The Motorola edge design is a little thicker but a bit lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and they were released only a couple months apart. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels number per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola edge features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola edge, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola edge, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Motorola edge counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity.
Motorola edge is way more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.