Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a newer 12 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's memory capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both of them have equal internal storage. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots slightly better photographs and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a larger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little longer battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.