Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a general score of 80.9, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's design is much newer, just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a newer 12 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have 8 GB of RAM, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has as much storage for apps and games as realme X3 SuperZoom, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a superior camera than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images, it also counts with a way better video definition, a much bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has improved battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.