Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is better than realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little lighter and a bit thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little larger screen. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a back camera with a way worse 50 mega pixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.