Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a general score of 81.9 against 72.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has newer 14 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is notably newer, somewhat lighter and a little thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1256 x 2760 resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a camera with a way better 64 MP resolution and better 60 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much bigger memory for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a bit better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.