Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is extremely newer, a little thinner and a bit lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a newer 14 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit bigger display.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture and a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much more MP back camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.