Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 87.1 score against 72.6. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is much newer, just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bit larger display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.