Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a global score of 81.5 against 72.6. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features. The Motorola Moto G 5G is a somewhat thicker and a bit heavier phone than realme X3 SuperZoom.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen.
The Moto G 5G features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes better pictures and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with better video frame rate and a camera with a much better resolution.
The Moto G 5G features better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.