Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Smoke black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power has a general score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Power has a more recent 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. Although Moto G Power and the realme X3 SuperZoom were released with only 2 months difference, Moto G Power's design is a little bit lighter but just a little bit thicker than the realme X3 SuperZoom.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little sharper display than Moto G Power, because it has a just a bit better screen pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger display. Moto G Power counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Power features longer battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Motorola Moto G Power is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.