Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus (2021) is a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a general score of 79.3 against 72.6. Moto G Stylus (2021)'s design has the same thickness than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's a little bit heavier. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little sharper display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a little higher pixel quantity per inch in the display.
Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with better video frame rate and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.