Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Blue and Red |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G7 Plus has a general score of 76.1, which is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. These devices have the same Android 10 operating system. Although the Moto G7 Plus is older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's construction is just a bit thinner and lighter. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better processor than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto G7 Plus has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera, higher video frame rate and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.