Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, giving you a couple nice extra features. The Moto Z Force construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 4 years before.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution. Motorola Moto Z Force has a way bigger storage for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Moto Z Force not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.