Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a overall score of 76.4 against 72.6. Although Moto Z Force Droid Edition is much older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is thinner and lighter. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back camera with lot more MP and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Realme X3 SuperZoom features improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.