Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's design is incredibly thinner and way lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released 3 years before. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixels density. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images, a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the realme X3 SuperZoom. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.