Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is an much older cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but Motorola made it notably thinner and way lighter anyway. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola Moto Z2 Play is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.