Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. Motorola Moto Z3 is an older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Motorola could make it notably thinner and noticeably lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing the user some extra features and better performance.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto Z3, because although it has a just a little lower pixels count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots greater pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much more megapixels back camera, higher video frame rates, a much larger sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations.
Moto Z3 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.