Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play has a score of 76.3, which is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. Moto Z3 Play is an older cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's incredibly thinner and notably lighter anyway. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Moto Z3 Play features much more memory for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a way better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures, a camera with lot more mega pixels and faster video frame rates.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play costs more than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.