Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has a newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Motorola One Hyper is a just a bit lighter device than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but both of them have the same thickness.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a quite better pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper has a superior memory to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little faster processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola One Hyper is also the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.