Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Blue and Brown |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a score of 80.7 against 72.6. Despite of the fact that Motorola One Vision is older than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's design is just a little thinner and lighter. Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision and realme X3 SuperZoom have extremely similar screens, because although the Motorola One Vision has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a bit better pixels quantity per inch in the display. Motorola One Vision counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a lot higher resolution back camera and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.