Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 7.2 has an overall score of 75.9, which is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. Even when the Nokia 7.2 and realme X3 SuperZoom were only released with a couple months difference, the Nokia 7.2 is lighter and just a bit thinner. Both devices in this review work with the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide you very similar OS features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit superior processing unit than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better looking display than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger display.
Nokia 7.2 features a superior storage for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Nokia 7.2 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior camera than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a lot better (4K) video definition and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features superior battery duration than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.