Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Meteor grey |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a general score of 80.3 against 72.6. Both devices in this review include the same Android 10 operating system, so both should provide you all the same OS features. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW body has the same thickness than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is heavier.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better processing power than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a slightly better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a just a little higher pixel quantity per screen inch.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has much more storage to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better camera than Nokia 8 V 5G UW. They have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a bit longer battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the realme X3 SuperZoom. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some money and get the realme X3 SuperZoom, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.