Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is slightly better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a general score of 76.4 against 72.6. Nokia 9 PureView's body is lighter and thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released only 15 months before. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better processor than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher screen density. Realme X3 SuperZoom and Nokia 9 PureView both count with similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has superior battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a way better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rates, a way larger back camera sensor and a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as realme X3 SuperZoom. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.