Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, the nubia Red Magic 3S construction is a bit thicker and a bit heavier than realme X3 SuperZoom. These phones have Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has the newer 9.0 Pie version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit faster processor than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit higher pixel density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes just a bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.