Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Sonic silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's global score of 72.6. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Even being the best we compare here, nubia Red Magic 5S's construction is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the realme X3 SuperZoom.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little better processing power than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per display inch and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, a same resolution camera in the back, the same video resolution and a 0.59 inches camera sensor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has higher video frame rates. The realme X3 SuperZoom and the nubia Red Magic 5S both have extremely similar memory for apps and games, both have the same 128 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the realme X3 SuperZoom. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.