Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Ocean |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 has a general score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. The OPPO Find X2 construction is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though they were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 operating system, so both should give the same operating system features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom and OPPO Find X2 count with very similar processing units, and although the OPPO Find X2 has 4 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores. OPPO Find X2 features a much better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a little larger display and more pixels per inch of display.
OPPO Find X2 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 has a battery lifetime that's just as good as the battery life in realme X3 SuperZoom. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.