Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Neo is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a global score of 77.7 against 72.6. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS. The OPPO Find X2 Neo is a thinner and somewhat lighter device than the realme X3 SuperZoom, although they were released only a few months apart.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a just a bit better display density. Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has more internal storage. The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4% more battery capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures a little bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.