Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Ocean |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 83.1 score against 72.6. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS. The OPPO Find X2 Pro design has the same thickness than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's just a bit heavier. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a quite bigger display, a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom and OPPO Find X2 Pro both count with extremely similar CPUs, and although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.