Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a overall score of 77 against 72.6. These devices have Android OS, but the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has newer 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it offers some extra features. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than realme X3 SuperZoom.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little more vivid screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a bit better screen pixels density. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution camera, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with higher video frame rates.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a much longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.