Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. Galaxy A22 5G's construction has the same thickness than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's a little heavier.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G. They have a same size screen, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same number of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A22 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A22 5G has longer battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.