Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a overall score of 79.9 against 72.6. Galaxy A25 5G is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit smaller screen.
Realme X3 SuperZoom captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A25 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.