Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is slightly better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A30 is an older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but it's lighter and thinner anyway. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A30 has a greater storage to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.