Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s is a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a overall score of 79.8 against 72.6. The Galaxy A30s is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter device than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even when they were only released with a couple of months difference. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy A30s has the newer 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a little larger screen. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A30s has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A30s also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 5% larger battery capacity.
The realme X3 SuperZoom takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.