Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy A31 and the realme X3 SuperZoom were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A31 is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a little larger display. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has a back camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations and a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A31 has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with longer battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 19 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.