Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is slightly better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a overall score of 79.6 against 72.6. The Galaxy A40 design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released just 14 months before. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy A40 has a more recent 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy A40 has a display that's just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A40 has a quite smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A40 counts with more storage for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom has better battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.