Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a 75.8 score against 72.6. The Galaxy A5 (2017) construction is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released many years before. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a quite lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.