Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is lighter and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, although it was released just a bit further than a year before. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A50 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.