Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide you very similar operating system features. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though both of them were released only a few months apart.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A50s has a superior storage to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little longer battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bigger sensor, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.