Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 85.5 score against 72.6. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A51's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom, even though both were released with only a few months difference.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.