Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism cube black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a global score of 90.8 against 72.6. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it gives you lots of additional features. The Galaxy A51 5G is a a little thinner and a little lighter cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, although they were released only 1 months apart.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel quantity per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a little bit larger display. The realme X3 SuperZoom has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera, a larger aperture and faster video frame rates.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.