Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a lot better than realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 90.7 score against 72.6. The Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it's also just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels number in each inch of display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a bit bigger display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size camera aperture, a same size sensor and a back camera with a 64 megapixels, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has higher 60 fps video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little longer battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.