Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a 91.3 score against 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse screen density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Realme X3 SuperZoom shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video quality, the same sensor size and the same resolution back-facing camera, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.