Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than realme X3 SuperZoom.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a higher amount of RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little inferior pixel quantity per inch of screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A52s has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a 0.59 inches camera sensor, a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back camera, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rate.
The Galaxy A52s counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.