Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 has a global score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 score. Although Galaxy A6 is way older than realme X3 SuperZoom, it's design is thinner and lighter. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a superior processing power than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a superior battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A6 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.