Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2017) has a global score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. Galaxy A7 (2017) is an extremely older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Samsung managed to build it thinner and just a little bit lighter. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a just a little higher display pixels density, a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with more storage for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 17 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.