Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A70 is an older cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Samsung managed to build it a little lighter and thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 10 OS, so both should give you all the same OS features.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a little bit better display pixel density. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a greater camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot bigger sensor and better video frame rate. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.